The admin dashboard fetches its side-sheet detail from project.getFullDetail
(not analytics.getProjectDetail as the audit assumed), and that procedure
had the same cross-round contamination bug. Add an optional roundId to
its input, filter the SUBMITTED-evaluations query when provided, and pass
roundId from the dashboard's useQuery so the Avg Score / Pass Rate /
Evaluators card now matches the per-juror list rendered below it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Previously the edition-level branch of analytics.getProjectRankings
(programId mode) pooled every juror's evaluations across every round
into a single z-normalization context. A juror's mean and stddev are
not stable across round types — quick intake screening produces a
very different grading profile than a deep evaluation round, and
mixing them yields a meaningless personal calibration.
The rollup now groups points by roundId, computes one balance context
per round, and aggregates per-project as the unweighted mean of the
per-round balanced averages. roundId mode is unchanged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The procedure pulled every SUBMITTED evaluation for a project across
every round it ever participated in, then computed Avg Score / Pass
Rate / Evaluators from that pool. Meanwhile the per-juror list rendered
in the admin sheet filters to the current round, producing a card that
disagreed with the visible list. With roundId in the input, callers
opt into round-scoped stats; omitting it preserves the old aggregate
behavior for any caller that hasn't been updated yet.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
