refactor(awards): remove AWARD_MASTER role, fold features into jury chair flow
All checks were successful
Build and Push Docker Image / build (push) Successful in 8m5s
All checks were successful
Build and Push Docker Image / build (push) Successful in 8m5s
The AWARD_MASTER role split sponsor jurors into a parallel UI that hid project files (only showed when the award was anchored to an evaluation round) and duplicated the jury voting path with no real difference in authority — tie-break and finalize were already governed by AwardJuror.isChair regardless of the user's global role. Inviting a juror via the award page defaulted to AWARD_MASTER, randomly fragmenting jury panels. This collapses the role into JURY_MEMBER + isChair: - specialAward.getMyAwardDetail now returns evaluation scores, chair visibility into other jurors' votes, and juror roster - specialAward.submitVote accepts an optional justification per vote - specialAward.confirmWinner moves from awardMasterProcedure to protectedProcedure (juror+chair check inside) - bulkInviteJurors creates JURY_MEMBER accounts and, when the award has a juryGroupId, also adds them to that JuryGroup so they appear on the round-page jury panel - jury award page renders justification, eval-score badges, and a chair tools panel with vote tally + finalize-winner CTA - juryGroup.list includes attached SpecialAwards; the jury-list UI shows a trophy pill alongside round pills - (award-master) route group, awardMasterProcedure, AWARD_MASTER role enum value, and AWARD_MASTER_DECISION decisionMode are deleted - migration demotes any residual AWARD_MASTER users to JURY_MEMBER and recreates the UserRole enum without the value Coup de Coeur on prod: Didier (the sponsor juror added today as AWARD_MASTER by the buggy invite form) was migrated to JURY_MEMBER and attached to the existing "Coup de Coeur" JuryGroup; the SpecialAward itself was linked to that group (juryGroupId was NULL). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ export const fileRouter = router({
|
||||
})
|
||||
)
|
||||
.query(async ({ ctx, input }) => {
|
||||
const isAdminOrObserver = ['SUPER_ADMIN', 'PROGRAM_ADMIN', 'OBSERVER', 'AWARD_MASTER'].includes(ctx.user.role)
|
||||
const isAdminOrObserver = ['SUPER_ADMIN', 'PROGRAM_ADMIN', 'OBSERVER'].includes(ctx.user.role)
|
||||
|
||||
if (!isAdminOrObserver) {
|
||||
const file = await ctx.prisma.projectFile.findFirst({
|
||||
@@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ export const fileRouter = router({
|
||||
roundId: z.string().optional(),
|
||||
}))
|
||||
.query(async ({ ctx, input }) => {
|
||||
const isAdminOrObserver = ['SUPER_ADMIN', 'PROGRAM_ADMIN', 'OBSERVER', 'AWARD_MASTER'].includes(ctx.user.role)
|
||||
const isAdminOrObserver = ['SUPER_ADMIN', 'PROGRAM_ADMIN', 'OBSERVER'].includes(ctx.user.role)
|
||||
|
||||
if (!isAdminOrObserver) {
|
||||
const [juryAssignment, mentorAssignment, teamMembership] = await Promise.all([
|
||||
@@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ export const fileRouter = router({
|
||||
roundId: z.string(),
|
||||
}))
|
||||
.query(async ({ ctx, input }) => {
|
||||
const isAdminOrObserver = ['SUPER_ADMIN', 'PROGRAM_ADMIN', 'OBSERVER', 'AWARD_MASTER'].includes(ctx.user.role)
|
||||
const isAdminOrObserver = ['SUPER_ADMIN', 'PROGRAM_ADMIN', 'OBSERVER'].includes(ctx.user.role)
|
||||
|
||||
if (!isAdminOrObserver) {
|
||||
const [juryAssignment, mentorAssignment, teamMembership] = await Promise.all([
|
||||
@@ -716,7 +716,7 @@ export const fileRouter = router({
|
||||
})
|
||||
)
|
||||
.query(async ({ ctx, input }) => {
|
||||
const isAdminOrObserver = ['SUPER_ADMIN', 'PROGRAM_ADMIN', 'OBSERVER', 'AWARD_MASTER'].includes(ctx.user.role)
|
||||
const isAdminOrObserver = ['SUPER_ADMIN', 'PROGRAM_ADMIN', 'OBSERVER'].includes(ctx.user.role)
|
||||
|
||||
// For non-admin/observer callers, mirror the per-round scope used by
|
||||
// file.getDownloadUrl: a juror assigned to round N may only pull URLs
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user